|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Good piece

Good piece

Posted Dec 5, 2012 21:25 UTC (Wed) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
In reply to: Good piece by man_ls
Parent article: LCE: Don't play dice with random numbers

> recurrence every 10^10^100

And don't fret, those 10's are rounded up from e, so it's not as long as it might seem (though I think you're missing few stacks and should be 10^10^10^10^10^1.1).


to post comments

Good piece

Posted Dec 5, 2012 21:38 UTC (Wed) by man_ls (guest, #15091) [Link]

You are right, I added the ellipsis on a Googolplex because I could not find any good estimate at the moment. Now I have: in the Wikipedia no less, and it is as you say. Saying it is bigger than the age of the universe is a bit of an understatement. So don't hold your breath for a recurrence.

Besides, it would only happen if our universe is an energy-conserving system; probably just changing size would break the recurrence.

Finally, even if a recurrence was possible in an expanding universe, it would just leave us at the starting point; not just diminish the entropy.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds